Search found 193 matches
- Sat Feb 01, 2020 6:37 pm
- Forum: Program editor
- Topic: Left Border of Editor Window
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13496
Re: Left Border of Editor Window
The standard Text Editor and Text Box controls don't have a 'bevel' by default. Isn't the presence of a 'bevel' principally a function of the window style, not what kind of control the window contains: nomainwin WindowHeight = 470 statictext #w.st1, "No Stylebits", 50, 20, 200, 32 stylebi...
- Sat Feb 01, 2020 12:54 pm
- Forum: Program editor
- Topic: Left Border of Editor Window
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13496
Re: Left Border of Editor Window
if you move the mouse pointer very slowly toward the left edge of the edit window, when it is over the narrow 'bevel' it changes to a right-pointing arrow. If you click the mouse in this position, it selects the whole line. I've never encountered that behavior and it's certainly nothing that I have...
- Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:01 pm
- Forum: Program editor
- Topic: Left Border of Editor Window
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13496
Re: Left Border of Editor Window
Richard, is it possible to make the left border of the editor window a bit wider, so the right-leaning cursor is easier to position for selecting all of a line with a single click? I'm afraid I have no idea what "the right-leaning cursor" is, nor how to select all of a line with a single ...
- Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:10 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
- Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:56 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
Re: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
Why does you I7 laptop perform correctly ,,, is it windows or a driver that is doing the capping? I believe the capping is the driver's reaction to detecting a fake chip. I assume I don't see any capping since my adapter has a genuine Prolific device. I can't think of any other reason why speed cap...
- Mon Dec 30, 2019 8:14 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
Re: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
19200 baud still get 220088 ms 220+ seconds this makes little since to me...... On the contrary it makes perfect sense if you assume my theory is correct: that the speed is being deliberately capped to 1000 characters per second. If that's true all rates up to and including 9600 baud will run at th...
- Mon Dec 30, 2019 4:41 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
- Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:53 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
Re: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
what adapter are you using. ???? The same one I used on the laptop: Prolific Rev. D chipset, identical to this . At £20 this is quite a lot more expensive than some of the fakes/clones, although cost is no guarantee of quality. The seller emphasises that it is genuine. The Prolific website contains...
- Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:46 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
Re: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
yea give it a shot . My Windows 10 / Intel Core i7 desktop gave the same result as the laptop, near enough. Unfortunately the program won't work at all on my AMD PC because that's running Windows 7 and it won't accept 115200 as a valid baud rate. Have you tried different baud rates to see if the pr...
- Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:43 pm
- Forum: Liberty BASIC Language
- Topic: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
- Replies: 31
- Views: 51540
Re: LBB much slower than LB in this pgm
! is generic FTDI other is CP210x I just got a while back. Clones ???? Some more information here . I could try my program on other PCs (including one with an AMD CPU) if you want, but I only have genuine USB-serial adaptors (some of my applications need functionality like hardware flow-control so ...